Friday, March 6, 2009

Just Ruminating

I was barely 18 years old; not that being 18 was any sort of a milestone or carried any special privileges or obligations. Back in the day, being 18 was a whole lot like being 17; just a year older. We couldn’t legally drink hard liquor, vote, or incur a contract. Hell, in most states we couldn’t marry unless we had mommy and/or daddy’s written permission. We could, however, register for the draft or enlist in the military without saying, “Mother, may I?” I suppose that made it a fair trade-off.

Anyway, I was 18 years old, just out of boot camp, and a couple of weeks aboard my ship. The Navy decided I needed some learning so they cut me a set of orders, bought me a plane ticket to San Francisco, told me to pack my ditty bag and get going. When I landed in San Francisco, I had a couple of changes of clothes, a carton of smokes, and a whole dime in my pocket. I used the dime to call Treasure Island for someone to pick me up.

That didn’t go well. Maybe if I had been wearing a uniform with some gold on the collars, they would have been more accommodating. Since my uniform had only an arm patch with two shiny white stripes on it, they left it to me to figure it out. I stepped outside the terminal, asked someone to point me in the right direction, stuck up my thumb, and commenced to figuring it out.

Between the terminal and the bus stop, where an old black man I’d asked for directions bought me a ticket to ride because no military man should have to hitchhike, damn near every queer in San Francisco stopped to offer me a ride. For any politically correct readers, I use “queer” in a historic sense. That was long before gay meant anything other than happy or the apparel to be donned at the yuletide – and I’m not sure what that was about.

Now, if ignorance was a felony, I would have been doing life without parole. The sum total of my world knowledge might have taken all of three or four paragraphs to inscribe. That said, by 18, I knew that queer meant something other than ol’ Uncle Jake who wasn’t wrapped as tightly as he should be. You know, sitting here typing these words and thinkin’ while I do it, I’m not at all sure that I was familiar with the word “homosexual.” I was one, naïve country bumpkin.

I’m not going to tell you that anyone got ugly with me. I’m not going to tell you that I went medieval on anyone. The come-ons were low key and polite. My “no thanks” were more in the line of “this is where I get out.” I wasn’t angry. I just didn’t want any part of whatever they were proposing and was perplexed as hell as to why they thought I would have even the remotest interest. By the time I got the hell out of San Francisco, I was seriously wondering if there was something about me that I didn’t know; else-wise why would all of those men be hitting on me?

There’s been a whole lot of water over the proverbial dam, and under the same bridge, since then. While my ignorance still outweighs my knowledge by a considerable amount, I have learned a few things since I set out on the sometimes-tumultuous river of life.

Yes, wondering if I was subconsciously gay was a troublesome thought in spite of incontrovertible evidence to the contrary. It took a while to realize that a guy hitting on me was no different from me hitting on a woman. You never know what’s going to happen until you make a move. As far as I could ever tell, homosexuals and lesbians don’t have a secret handshake to identify one another and gaydar isn’t always reliable.

I am amazed that, in this day and age of relative enlightenment, so many are driven to homophobic-induced spasms of paranoia. I don’t understand why they are frightened of the gay community. With all the empirical evidence to the contrary, they can’t possibly believe that homosexuality equates pedophilia. Surely they can’t believe the manner in which someone expresses their sexuality makes them somehow less of a person.

The screaming mantra that same sex marriages will forever destroy “traditional” marriage is beyond my ken. The thought that anyone’s marriage can impact negatively on anyone else’s marriage is both specious and incomprehensible. With the divorce rate hovering somewhere around 50%, it seems to me that traditional marriage is hell bent for leather on destroying itself.

I don’t have a clue how the Supreme Court will rule on the Prop 8 challenge in California. It stunned me when Prop 8 passed. In my regrettable ignorance, I thought Californians were past thinking the gay community was a subspecies that rendered them ineligible for American citizenship.

The Court may well declare it to be constitutional. I’m thinking, if they do, that is going to create one hell of a slippery slope. If a vote can render someone less than a citizen, I have to wonder who is next. Will it be a racial or ethnic group?

Tyranny by the masses is still tyranny.

Life is sweet – but parts of it can be unjust.

9 comments:

The Texican said...

Hi Sailor, new in town? I just read where the California Supremes upheld prop 8, but agreed to grandfather the ones who married before its passage. I still sing the old Cowboy ballad "Streets of Laredo" and in one line it says, "it was once in the saddle I used to ride freely. Once in the saddle I used to go gay...." In modern times it's hard to sing that line without thinking of "Brokeback Mountain." The times they are a changin'. Pappy

littleone said...

i once had a lesbian friend - who after a few years with the same woman - it was decided they would get married. Now it wasn't exactly legal back then.. but it wasn't exactly ILlegal either. You could find a minister to marry you and the wedding could take place. The papers you signed were filed away safely until such time as the government passed the bill that would make same sex marriages legal.

Turns out the marriage didn't work.. my friend went her way - which was all the way to New Mexico. And then.. she heard that Quebec was going to legalize gay marriages. Panic set in....

She found the minister that married her.. found the papers and had them destroyed.

Now i am not entirely sure why i told you that story (i am old and tend to forget things - cheeky grin)

BUT my personal belief is ... it is wrong - just plain wrong - that gays cannot have the same rights as straight folks... forget marriage.. that's not the only right... there are gobs of rights they are missing out on... spousal health insurance - division of property - visitation rights in hospitals.. etc etc...

i do know - that up here in Quebec you can attain those rights if you are willing to hire a lawyer and put them down in a contract. Don't have to get married.. just need a damn good lawyer.

and that's it for me - the font of all _______


wiggle wiggle
morningstar (owned by Warren)

Robbie said...

I have never understood the concept of homophobia myself.
When on the rare occassion I have found myself being propositioned by another guy, I thank them for the compliment and explain that I just don't have an interest in guys.

I will never understand how proposition 8 passed in california.. or the similar bill passed here in florida..

Now it appears the supreme court is upholding the vote. If the majority of the US population voted to reinstitute slavery, would that make it ok?

lili said...

Not agreeing with something is not a phobia. Disagreement with a thing is not necessarily based on fear. Both sides are equal at tossing wrong labels.

Homophobia, the actual phobia with all its parts in place is rare. The label is applied too broadly, and in too many instance, incorrectly.

When people are allowed to vote, and they do, their vote is not a tyranny. Take that complaint to the law makers if you don't like it, but don't rip voters apart for doing what they're allowed.

selkie said...

I find proposition 8 an abomination - and am relieved to at least hear that those who in good faith made the plunge are now not going to "unlegalized".

I always feel that men who have such an issue with being propositioned are perhaps uncertian in their own minds? I mean it really is the same as anyone being hit on - just deal with it - politily and move on. No big deal.

watcher said...

"If a vote can render someone less than a citizen, I have to wonder who is next."

...this time. seems like "who" changes but not the ignorance that feeds the attitudes.

Whitesnake said...

In my humble opinion it only begs one question.......

Are they happy?
If so leave em the hell alone and let em get on with it!

rockync said...

"Long haired hippies! Dirty Bikers! Uppity Black Panthers! Communist Queers!" and the beat goes on... (sigh)

Maybe we will find some peace, love and understanding in the NEXT life! :)

Buffalo said...

Texican: I hadn't heard that when I wrote the piece. I hope the times are changing. Seems wrong to me to deny a segment of the population full rights.

morningstar: I do believe it is very wrong.

Robbie: Well said!

Lili: I believe it is a combination of homophobia and religion driven bigotry. Any time the majority, by their vote, can rob a group of their rights it is tyranny in my book.

Selkie: Has me shaking my head.

Shady Lady: The who and the what change. The results remain the same.

Steve: Exactly

Rocky: I'm guessing it going to depend on who is in charge. Thanks for dropping by and taking the time to comment.